#JARVIS VOICE SOUND FILES TRIAL#
Well, I think one of the elements of this trial that stood out to many of the people who were watching it from the outside was this key decision by the prosecution team and the lead prosecutor, Linda Dunikoski, that really kind of went against the grain of the broader narrative of the story of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery. And yet here the jury overwhelmingly found all three men involved in this case guilty of murder, so help us understand how we got here. And the second was the verdict just a few days earlier in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, where a self-defense argument had prevailed. The first was our sense, as you had told us, that under Georgia’s self-defense and citizen’s arrest laws, the three defendants in this case would have a relatively strong case. Richard, heading into deliberations last week, it was not at all clear what direction the jurors were going to go in with this verdict, and I think a lot of that came down to two things. I spoke to my colleague, Richard Fausset, about why the prosecutors chose not to make race the center of a case that many saw as an obvious act of racial violence.
The triggerman, Travis McMichael, his father, Gregory McMichael, and their neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, claimed that they suspected Arbery of burglaries in their neighborhood and were attempting to make a citizen’s arrest. The three men who killed Ahmaud Arbery have been found guilty of murder. We, the jury, find the defendant Travis McMichael, the defendant Greg McMichael and the defendant William R. Please hand your verdict forms to the sheriff. Madam Foreperson, I understand you have reached a verdict as to each defendant. Monday, November 29th, 2021 michael barbaroįrom New York Times, I’m Michael Barbaro. We explore how the prosecution secured this verdict from a mostly white jury. Transcript A Prosecutor’s Winning Strategy in the Ahmaud Arbery Case The three men charged with killing Ahmaud Arbery were found guilty of murder.
0 kommentar(er)
